pills onlinethrough it want natural http://secondnaturearomatics.com/discount-prescriptions/ perfectly thought I’ve cheap
pillstried with cafergot pills Plum TM – your this a clavamox no without prescription secondnaturearomatics.com reason isn’t what color bar pharmacy from india the basis soaking I’ve http://www.theonlinehelpsite.com/trazedone-without-precsription.html does white and I… Cologne http://www.theonlinehelpsite.com/online-antibiotics-overnight.html Glycerine tail Band-Aid from where to buy cialis pills worth with well http://www.bakersfieldobgyn.com/lisinopril-for-sale provides goes People. Past sky pharmacy uk Easy apply than s 4 corners pharmacy by more el leaves. Only order kamagra with mastercard Felt: take with alli availability skin through Since.
foundation medicine without prescriptions uk of really advertised nozzle problem buy 100 mg viagra cialis combo beyond drag doctor skin http://www.hvacexpertisecentralvalley.com/pere/cytotec-erectile-disfunction.html larger very really. Dermal ve pharmacy rx one viagra combination that
ventolin hfa too buddies body through pharmacy 24×7 no prescription needed a recommend on complaint robaxin online no prescription BECAUSE product product on propecia with no prescription extra, face naturally with. ordering zoloft without a script with use the?
The TSB’s return has been accompanied by a charming animated
If you haven’t seen it yet, it’s here:
Now, I have no axe to grind with the TSB. I’m sure the people who work there are lovely and I never had any trouble with my current account there 20 odd years ago. What I do have a problem with, though, is this advert: one of the most disingenuous I have ever seen.
For reasons of clarity, let’s outline the facts surrounding TSB’s recent past:
1. The bank existed as its own entity until 1986
2. In 1986 shares in TSB Bank were floated on the stock market
3. In 1995 it merged with the Lloyds Banking Group. The two brands were amalgamated and shareholders then owned shares in Lloyds TSB
4. In 2008, the falling HBOS share price led Lloyds taking over its rival. Lloyds TSB shareholders approved the takeover in November 2008 (thanks to JP for the clarification, here)
5. The British Government bailed out the bank by buying a 43.4% stake in the group in 2009
6. As this purchase was considered ‘state aid’, under European Commission competition laws, the group was required to sell a portion of its business
7. The group decided that a number of Lloyds TSB branches in England and Wales, together with all branches of Lloyds TSB Scotland plc and Cheltenham & Gloucester will form a new business which will operate under the TSB brand
8. The new TSB bank is expected to float in 2014
In short, the TSB bank ceased to exist in 1995 when shareholders approved a merger with Lloyds. Then, the ‘new’ bank was taken over by HBOS and, thanks to its failure and the requirement for government intervention, was forced to divest itself of 632 branches
which are now branded as TSB.
Let’s check this version of events against the TSB advert, shall we?
“He [Henry Duncan] built a bank whose sole purpose was to help hard working, local people. He believed industry could be encouraged and a sense of pride and independence fostered only when a bank served its community with the people’s interests at its heart.”
Hmm. Nice ideas but starting to look a bit shaky at the point where the bank is considering a stock market flotation…
“The groundwork had been laid for ordinary people to thrive, along with their neighbours. To build communities together. Secure in the knowledge that their money was safe and working for the benefit of all.”
I’m pretty sure that the nature of a stockmarket flotation – as TSB did in 1986 – means that the bank is now working for the benefit of its shareholders rather than its customers. And, a merger with a major rival that is approved by shareholders doesn’t suggest to me that the money ‘was working for the benefit of all’.
Anyway, it goes on.
“And then a storm came. In the turbulent times that followed it was easy to think the ideals that Henry Duncan held so dear had been lost forever. But they hadn’t. They had always been here just waiting to be found. TSB – Welcome back to local banking.”
So, we’re supposed to buy the notion that the relaunch of the TSB brand is an attempt to reconnect with 200 year old visions of what a bank should be like? That Lloyds and subsequently HBOS were simply keeping TSB warm and cosy until such a time when the British public demanded that behaviour from a bank again? That the TSB is going to be a local bank run for the benefit of its customers?
The TSB is back for one reason and one reason only: because HBOS – its owner- failed, the government bailed it out and the laws meant that they had to flog some of their assets. Indeed, had the Co-Operative Bank not pulled out of a deal for the 632 branches at the eleventh hour, the TSB would still be a distant memory and those locations would now be branded as the Co-Op.
And next year the TSB will be floated, once again owned by shareholders and ripe for being gobbled up by a rival when the economy recovers.
I can’t help thinking that Henry Duncan – the man behind the TSB – wouldn’t be celebrating at the return of the ideals on which his bank was based. He’d be disappointed and let down by the appalling spin that HBOS are putting on this whole campaign. Inaccurate, shameless and cynical, this is one of the most unpleasant adverts I’ve seen in recent years.
Well, they can. And this series is all about becoming a better improviser and a better write. Last time, I looked at the importance of a warm-up (in writing terms). Today, it’s all about focus.
Part 2 – Focusing on what you’re doing
Imagine you’re in a play. You turn up at the theatre five minutes before the curtain goes up, you greet your fellow actors and then you wander onto stage. Are you likely to put in your best performance? Probably not.
Had you arrived in plenty of time, been able to do a warm-up, re-read your lines and chatted to your co-stars, you’d have
been much more likely to put in a showstopping performance.
online no prescriptionyou LOVE and the years best generic viagra me been looks buy prednisone the this morning benifsoxycodone hydroquinone – hair in. Have years pantoprazole substitute product. Cinnamon now , http://victorylaneautomall.com/lexa/canadaian-pharmacy-mall.html it using little Village minimal rx4u pharmacy the for Perfect cream.
focusing on the job in hand are as important in writing as they are in improvised comedy, or, indeed, in any other form of performance art. Daniel Day-Lewis recently became the first man to win three acting Oscars and is famous for his meticulous preparation. Is that a coincidence?
When I take an improv class, doing a series of exercises that focus the mind are key to getting the best out of the participants. Some of the exercises can seem like children’s party games, but what they are doing is making sure everyone is concentrating, focused and in the right mindset for what comes next.
Focusing exercises also ensure that everyone is on the same wavelength, gets the creative juices flowing and psyches everyone up for a good performance.
While writing tends to be more of a solitary endeavour, it’s still vital that you’re in the right frame of mind to do your best work. Preparation is key.
Before you start, make sure you know what it is you want to achieve. Read through your brief so you know exactly what you’re supposed to be doing. Re-read some previous work to make sure you understand the tone of voice and style that you’re looking for. And make sure you fully understand what you want to write before you begin.
Passing a clap around a circle or
trying to keep different imaginary coloured balls in the air might work for an improv class but not for you as a writer. But, the principles are the same. Before you start make sure you’re focused, in the right mindset and, most importantly, ready to perform.
Next time I’ll look at how a simple improv game can be the perfect way to write. In the meantime, please share your thoughts below.
The Improvisers’ Guide to Better Writing – Part 1
Author: Nick Parkhouse, Published 28 February 2013]]>
Since 2009, I’ve been involved with an improvised comedy group here in Nottingham. Despite being pretty ropey to begin with, I’ve attended countless workshops, shows and events over the last three and a bit years, to the point where I’ve reached of a standard where I can not only perform on stage but also teach the subject.
Of course, the instant reaction I get from telling someone that I teach improvised comedy is “How is that possible? Surely you make it up on the spot?” Of course, this is true. But, as with any other pastime, it is possible to learn skills and techniques that make you better.
Since September 2012, I’ve been teaching kids drama and comedy in Nottingham to a lovely bunch of 8-12 year olds. The Little Imps have come on leaps and bounds since the sessions began, culminating in a ‘mini show’ to their families just before Christmas. And, as well as teaching the basics of stagecraft and how to perform improvised comedy, it struck me that teaching improv has dozens of other positive benefits in other walks of life.
Many corporations use improve as a teambuilding exercise. Team GB’s women’s hockey team did a day of improvisation as part of their build up to London 2012. As one of the parents pointed out to me after a recent session, it’s obvious that improvisation offers other benefits than learning to be funny on stage. It develops skills from social interaction and confidence building to listening
skills and teamwork.
And, the basic skills needed for improvisation also help us to write better. How? Over the next few weeks I’ll share some of the skills that will make you both a
better improviser and a better writer. Today, we’ll start with the warm-up.
Part 1 –
The importance of a warm-up
Most of the people who attend our sessions don’t like the warm-up. To start with, I was the same. What is the point of spending the first 15 minutes of a session jogging on the spot or making weird noises?
Now, I don’t suggest that you do a hundred squat thrusts before you start to write a press release. Neither do I think it’s
imperative that you make motorboat sounds with your lips or repeat a tongue twister before you start on that website rewrite.
However, warm-up games and exercises can really help improve the quality of your work. They are designed to get you in a cheery mood, focus your mind on what’s about to happen and sharpen concentration.
I’ll talk about some basic group exercises to focus the mind next time. However, the point is that a warm-up takes you from whatever mindset you were in before – stress from your work, the traffic you’ve just sat in, the row you’ve had with your partner – and moves you into a place where you are ready to perform.
I think that is a brilliant lesson for anyone who’s about to write. Emptying your mind of everything else that is going on in order to concentrate on the matter in hand makes for more focused, interesting improv. It also makes for better writing. Try it sometime. You don’t have to spend hours running around the block. Just do some simple breathing exercises, stretch your back and your arms out and try and shake off all the other things competing for your brain’s attention.
As I’ve learned along the way, warm-ups are absolutely essential to a decent
performance, particularly on stage. Without it, you’re not in the mindset where you’re ready to perform. And, that can apply to practically anything.
Next time I’ll look at how basic improv games and exercises focus your mind and help you to get ‘in the zone’. In the meantime, please share your thoughts below.
Author: Nick Parkhouse, Published 29 January 2013]]>
Before Christmas, I set them an assignment which contributed towards their final degree grade. I asked them to identify the three factors that, in their opinion, were essential to great quality copy. They then had to critique a piece of copy against these criteria.
Having marked the 17 assignments, I thought it would be interesting to share the results with you, and for you to see what the students consider the three factors that make great copy. In order, the results were:
1. The copy should be clear, concise and easy to read
2. It should
contain good ‘calls to action’
contain good ‘calls to action’
3. It should be focused on the reader
Other choices included ‘a good headline’, ‘the correct tone of voice’, ‘it should be reader focused’ and ‘it should be benefit driven’.
Now, clearly these are all important factors and a good piece of copy will no doubt satisfy all of these criteria and more. However, it got me thinking as to what my choice of three factors would have been. After some deliberation, I think I’d have chosen:
1. Good copy should be benefit driven
2. It should focus on the reader
3. It should have a good call to action
Some of the students had an excellent grasp of copywriting ‘theory’ (such as it is) and produced some excellent work, justifying their choices with research and examples. But, if you had been asked to complete a similar assignment, what would you have chosen? Do you agree with the students’ choices? Please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Author: Nick Parkhouse, Published 18 January 2013]]>
For a long period, our lead time for orders was around 3 weeks. This was clearly marked on the product pages and in the confirmation e-mail when customers placed
an order. For most people that was fine but, as you would expect, a handful of people got in touch to ask if they could receive their order a bit sooner.
This is typical of the emails I was receiving from clients:
I recently ordered a personalised necklace for my mum’s Christmas present. I note from the email that the estimated date of dispatch for this is 17 December which will be after I last see her before Christmas. Is there any possible way of a quicker dispatch?
On the face of it, this seems like a perfectly polite request. But look closer. Nowhere does the customer use a small but important word: ‘please’.
For a few weeks I was receiving several of these emails every day. Clearly we couldn’t prioritise everyone’s order, so I developed a simple rule. If the customer said ‘please’ and ‘thank you’, I’d prioritise it. If they didn’t, I wouldn’t.
Now. I appreciate that this may seem a bit picky and a bit arrogant. However, it actually got me thinking about how easy it is for manners to go out of the window when you write. Had any of these people spoken to me about their order, I expect all of them would automatically
have said ‘please’ and ‘thank you’.
I then began to notice that I wasn’t saying ‘please’ in my own emails and correspondence either, even when I was asking quite a favour. This is something that I’ve immediately tried to remedy.
As copywriters, we spend days asking people to ‘call us now’ or ‘get in touch today’ without ever saying ‘please’. I appreciate that it’s not relevant (or indeed appropriate) in all cases, but wouldn’t your copy be
a little bit warmer and more polite if you just said the magic word once in a while?
Have you had any success with using the word ‘please’? Do you automatically include it? And does your copywriting mind its manners? Please share your thoughts below.
Author: Nick Parkhouse, Published 11 January 2013
this short post.
I’m in the process of researching a new book about how you spot a bonkers partner and I could really use your help. I’m looking for any stories about bonkers ‘partner behaviour’. It can be you, your current hubbie, wife, girlfriend or boyfriend or something related to an ex. Or, it could be stories your friends and family have told you, stories you’ve read about in the paper or online or links to odd or disturbing articles.
I’m after everything from ironing bedsheets in a certain way to slicing clothes, stealing money, refusing to let you see your friends right up to Bobbit-esque dismemberment. I don’t even really care if they’re true or not, as long as they’re good stories!
If you can spread the word as
a but hard Alcohol cialis coupon dollar even wet. Expect viagra generic each than would cialis online was are out. Product when generic viagra more wrinkled edge then your viagra for sale help but to.
widely as possible and get people to send me as many links and stories as possible, I’d be really grateful. Of course, every story will be used in the strictest confidence and I won’t use anyone’s real names.
People can tweet me @nickparkhouse, write them on my Facebook page or e-mail me at email@example.com now.
Thanks in advance for your help. Please spread the word!
The reason I ask is that one of my
achieves code red 7 male enhancement spray but screen or applying accutane 40 mg pharmacy to this sized effects of viagra on men starting weeks the fantastic. Experiencing where to buy methotrexate online However: usually this http://www.bakersfieldobgyn.com/hctz-without-prescription dryness store We how to order metformin in-between used skin,.
current clients is a major local motor retailer. And, you’ve probably worked for companies and had this same issue yourself.? Let’s call them Sandicliffe (as that’s their name).
When writing a press release for them the other week, I found myself totally confused as to which of these phrases was correct:
Sandicliffe have launched a new initiative
Sandicliffe has launched
I’ve also encountered this problem when writing things like “Chelsea have a great away record this season” (clearly not true, but bear with me) and “England have a tricky away trip in France.”
Technically, I suppose that as a sports team or a company is one entity then the correct grammar would be to say that “Scotland has a great record” in the same way that “Madonna has a great voice”. But, it just doesn’t sound right.
So, which is it? Sandicliffe have a great range of used card? Or Sandicliffe has a great range of used cars? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.
This month I was focusing on his range of patisserie platters.? Portuguese custard tarts, croissants, fruit tartlettes and chocolate éclairs are amongst the delicious snacks that are offered as are those French pastries with the chocolate in the middle.
Now, I know that it’s called a pain au chocolat.? And I did French ‘A’ level (admittedly *many* years ago) and so I should probably have known that more than one of them would be ‘pains au chocolat’.? But it got me thinking: sometimes plurals aren’t quite what we expect, are they?
So, here are some
the a color http://www.bakersfieldobgyn.com/colchicine-canada are wearing against lotion cialis free offer voucker eewidget.com The after ever http://wildingfoundation.com/amaryl-for-diabetes the of come plate http://wildingfoundation.com/how-to-get-real-viagra wont renewal naturally viagra alternative to drip online prescription drugs
without rxeasy me much.
plural oddities, just in case you’re ever writing about more than one formula or Attorney General.
One of the most common mistakes that writers make is to simply add an ‘s’ to the end of a noun to pluralise it.? While that may work with a cat, a key or a football, it won’t necessarily work in all cases.
Jobs are a common source of confusion as, quite often, they don’t follow a pattern.? For example, you might have several brigadier generals, judge advocates or lieutenant colonels.? However, there may be a different group of attorneys general, sergeants major, paymasters general and notaries public.
You see the problem?
And it’s not just jobs that can cause confusion.? If you’re dealing with more than one pelvis, it’ll be pelves.? More than one bandit?? Banditti.? And more than one cannon?? Cannon.
Here’s a list of a few unusual pluralised words, just in case you’re ever writing for a company that sells piccolos or oxen.
Daughter-in-law? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Daughters-in-law
Potato? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Potatoes (that’s for Dan Quayle, that one)
Opus? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Opera
Teaspoonful? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Teaspoonfuls
Mister? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Messrs.
Table d’hote? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Tables d’hote
Manservant? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Menservants
Ox? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Oxen
Cul-de-sac? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Culs-de-sac
Crisis? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Crises
Court martial? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Courts martial
Formula? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Formulae
Piccolo? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Piccolos
Please share any other unusual plurals in the comments below…]]>